Phased light; Blu-ray; The Luddite fear of the unknown.

Phased Light has always fascinated me. The original theory that a silver-nitrate substrate could successfully record an interference pattern such that the same frequency would reproduce the image in 3d space, given a 'bath' of phased light to interact within, has led my mind to theorize a moving picture in a cinematic camera. This holographic scene is colored by pixelation of red, green and blue lasers. LEDs can generate the colors and wave lengths, and reality might be that phased light's' cannot coexist without interference perforce :-( LCDs could still display monochromatic holograms like the vaunted Princess Lea special effect, IF the relevant twisting could recreate the interference pattern.

In regard to Data-storage, we could look at DVD as a modified very data-dense 'Redbook' format. Under these conditions, 8GB DVD is a two-layer DVD. Blu-Ray has taken the Red frequency and refined its exactness with shorter frequencies of blue, and added the sophistication (sophistry?) of ~8 layers. As such, I expect Blu-Ray Disks to be more vulnerable to scratching than Redbook DVD, all parity checking being equal. Intuitively, the 'masses' of tyrannical wisdom may adequately infer this from increased data density.

For phased light imaging, we should invent the racially neutral photo 'phit,' to go with the magnetic 'bit' and the quantum 'qbit.' Pixels are still pixels.

If Blue light is useful when phased, don't overlook that ultra-violets are also phased. X-rays were phased during the Reagan administration, all in aid of 'Star Wars.' While their use in holographically imaging bone cannot be arranged, they would save conventional bullets in a devastating conventional war with India or China (India currently surpasses China in population, if not in area.) The relevant lasers cannot save time, but serve to re-enforce the older MAD discussion.

I understand micro-waves to be light energy in a frequency that exactly matches the characteristic wavelength between two 'H' atoms in a water molecule. "Phasing that (in a standing wave,) for fun," might result in imaging something we have not yet imagined, or heating with an exactness unavailable before the present.

Adhering to any philosophy in the face of a perceived 'event horizon,' is morally trying. I humorously ask "When we were about to split the 'H' atom, the theists were taking odds... what were the atheists doing?" Presumably cursing the folly of the theists as usual.

In that context, we have now had THREE experiments in the face of extinction. The 'A' bomb, the 'H' bomb and the recent attempts at a localized black hole. Since the probability is remote, by all means hazard the risk as needed for research, but please don't make a small black hole a goal so near us... it's not unreasonable to suggest moving our legitimate investigations into the chances of folding space just beyond the orbit of Neptune and Pluto.

In re that discussion, there are two problems that impel us to better science for CO2 processing:

1. If folding space at a distant point takes energy at all, can an adequate amount be derived from a given planet or star?

2. Should this transit become possible, is the local heat situation bearable, AND is the distant point itself accessible for practical experiment?

To test your the rational nature of your humor: If you calculated Avogadro's number to 23 decimal places, you should rationally be wondering if mensuration is the problem, or counting. If you are more concerned with extending the decimal count, please take a pill... the fractional molecules will become fractional atoms, with catastrophic results.