A picture of me, making a POLITICAL mistake;

Washington D.C. is historic for employing the hub and spoke method of minimizing the mean transit time for ALL packages. Before the plans for District of Columbia were laid out, St. Petersberg (Southeast of Murmansk,) Russia, and Amsterdam, Holland were the only beneficiaries of the historic mathematical economy. The outermost ring is called the "beltway," and it personifies an abstract philosophical divide, abbreviated "Outside the Beltway."

In rural America, when a railroad crossing is not arranged as an underpass or an overpass, the side of town that has to wait for trains to pass in order to gain access to commerce is less desirable. This is abbreviated, "the wrong side of the tracks," and I herein submit that being from "outside the beltway," amounts politically to being from "the wrong side of the tracks."

I have offended reliably and in enduring ways as follows: I employed a politically flawed algorithm. This is as profound a failing as attempting to mechanize or automate the acquisition of a date, and I have no individual whose car I may wash, or to whom I may present a bouquet of flowers in apology. Upon favorable receipt, I could not expect to present the results at a bank for consideration, any more than a young lady's favor advantages me at a coffee shop.

Whatever colorful language you attribute to my estate, it gives me "nothing to lose," politically, but also no possible means of gain or political advancement. I estimate that only God's rebuke to my comment that "It is impossible to rehabilitate me," can overcome the odds.

My mistake is documented here. Learn if possible. The chick's ain't diggin' it!

Step 1. Have idea.
Step 2. Reason that a good idea stands on it's own merit. Bypass early resistance by simply shopping it around indiscriminately.
Step 3. Present it US mail to an aide in an office, mistakenly believing that Senators, Congressmen and important people in general, read their own correspondence.
Step 4. After an imagined adequate latency, document in a publicly available way that you submitted the suggestion: I have posted letters verbatim.

Step 4 offends with certainty and finality, for one of two reasons.
a) The idea "was not followed up on," and the good idea indicts the system for ignoring it.
b) The idea _WAS_ followed up on, but attributions are such that the letter embarrasses un-named co-conspirators. Under these conditions even genuine gratitude that an idea could not be killed in historical timing (simply by a fight over credit,) does not adequately reimburse the political lackey who took the hit.

I believe that the varying degrees of passion and sincerity with which I am disliked or hated do NOT bely the universality of it. I fail in the end to gratify "them," with bitterness if possible, and seek my own avenue to redemption. God Bless America, God help me :-)